Personal legal expenses insurance could help you and your family with a number of legal issues, depending on what cover you have.
This site can help you learn about legal expenses insurance, how to get it, and how to use it if you have it.
See what we offer to our people
Legal expenses insurance can help you with a number of legal issues affecting your business.
News and analysis from our experts
Many brokers and law firms have chosen to partner with DAS.
Here you can find out why our partners choose us, and how you can join them.
We've now made it even easier for customers to make a claim. Here you can find out how.
In response to some general criticism of Legal Expenses Insurance (LEI) in the press recently, Nathan Holt, Head of Trading Underwriting at DAS UK, sets the record straight…
A consumer piece in one of the weekend broadsheets caught my eye recently. It’s not that often that LEI makes the big papers, so this jumped out at me – albeit not for the right reasons. The article began as a description of the negative experience of one specific customer but then went on to be fairly broadly critical of LEI as a whole, which was actually really disappointing to read.
Working in the insurance industry, I can completely sympathise with the customer, but I firmly believe that not all LEI products are created equal and, in the current litigious society, a good quality LEI product will offer affordable access to justice that wouldn’t otherwise be available.
I also can’t help but feel that in cases such as the one mentioned – where a customer was reportedly “passed from pillar to post” with nobody providing help – that not only has the customer been let down but so has the primary insurer.
As LEI is often a white labelled ‘add-on’ product it is fundamental that your LEI provider understands that they are responsible for the reputation of not only their own brand, but also that of the main insurance provider.
If you are an LEI provider, it is also fundamental that you support your customers during their hour of need – as DAS UK does – through legal advice, online legal services, or ultimately of course, litigation if it’s necessary.
A situation can also arise when a business partner changes their LEI provider – LEI can be written on either a ‘claims made’ or a ‘claims occurred’ basis with the former often offering a very small claims window.
This can be particularly unsuitable in a long tail class of business and can often result in a customer being passed between LEI providers before finding that neither can help as they have changed providers since the incident that resulted in a legal dispute – a poor resolution and customer experience mess.
This is very unfair to the customer which is why we offer our policies on a ‘claims occurred’ basis to make sure the customer continues to have cover for that period even if they chose to move insurers.
The article also criticised the outsourcing of such services, asserting that it is confusing and makes life difficult for the customer. I would argue quite the contrary, provided you have a comprehensive service proposition and the right LEI provider.
Legal disputes and the expenses that can arise have the potential to be very complex and expensive matters, and it is vital that these services are provided by appropriate experts supported by suitable literature.
It should always be clear within a customer’s documentation who is providing these services and our general experience with customers shows that as long as you take ownership, show compassion for their issue, and provide expert, clear and honest advice then they generally have no issue with a service being outsourced. This again demonstrates the importance of partnering with the right LEI provider.
As we’ve spoken about before, the value and quality of legal expenses policies can vary greatly. Some offer limited value to a customer, having numerous waiting periods, limited claims windows or restrictive cover. With policies like these, even if you have a valid insurable dispute, it may be impossible to make a claim due to an economic exclusion clause (where the amount in dispute is less than the legal costs to pursue).
As an industry expert, this saddens me but I am proud that this is not the type of LEI provided by DAS UK. As a company we are proud of the quality of our offering, delivering and improving our products and removing barriers to better align customers and business partner expectations with the products and propositions we offer.
For us, both of our customers are important; the policyholder who has purchased the product and expects us to help when they have a legal query or dispute, and the business partner to whom we have been entrusted to provide this promise to their valued customer.
Come and connect with us at BIBA19. DAS UK Group will be at stand F39 – see you there.
Two years on the government’s consultation on fixed recoverable costs, ATE Underwriting Manager David Brown restates the DAS position on this highly complex issue.
Fran Clothier, DAS UK Group’s ATE Business Partnership Manager, shares her thoughts on the thought provoking annual SCIL (Society of Clinical Injury Lawyers) conference which took place in Birmingham recently.
Nathan Holt, Head of Trading Underwriting at DAS, looks at how things could end up for landlords in the unknown post-Brexit landscape.
BIBA 2019: Did it lead the way on social?
BIBA19: Tweeting the way
Alison Whitcombe, Propositions Manager at DAS, looks at how the ATE industry can do more to help clients and customers.
Jane Harper, ATE Technician, DAS UK Group looks at the ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust case which will have huge repercussions for clinical negligence.
Legal expenses insurance has a major part to play in giving people and SMEs everyday peace of mind, now more than ever before.
2019 was another interesting year across the clinical negligence, civil litigation and personal injury sectors. We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners what their predictions are for 2020…
We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners how they will be spending their respective Christmases.
We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners what their achievements were, what their fears are, and what they thought of the latest technological developments.
It’s been another interesting year across the clinical negligence, civil litigation and personal injury sectors. We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners for their thoughts on 2019.
DAS UK Group’s ATE Business Partnership Manager Fran Clothier shares her thoughts on this year’s Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) conference in Brighton…
DAS has partnered with property technology company Goodlord to launch a new Rent and Legal Protection policy for Goodlord customers.
The recent court decision of West & Demouilpied was a potentially huge moment for the ATE market. David Brown breaks down the potential impact on ATE premiums and more.
To mark the centenary of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919, we got some female perspectives on ATE insurance and the role it plays in supporting access to justice.
With the AvMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference (ACNC) taking place in Leeds this week, Robyn Lampon from DAS UK Group looks at how ATE insurance has evolved over the last 20 years.
Now that the BIBA bubble has burst for another year, Social Media Executive Steph Davies takes a look back at BIBA 2019 and asks: Was it a success on social?