The importance of ATE to commercial LEI customers

5th April 2022

Following on from her appearance at the recent Meet the MGA Market event, Carol Parsons, Head of ATE at DAS, talks about the importance of ATE to commercial customers. 

Having spent 6 years on the BTE side of the business, to which a certain amount of allegiance still lies, I appreciate that there are compelling reasons for brokers to advise customers to purchase legal expense insurance as part and parcel of their general insurance portfolio and therefore, in advance of any possible need for the product arising.

Taking legal expenses cover out as part of your customers general insurance portfolio will almost inevitably result in a very modest premium for the customer, essentially where a broker already has a scheme arrangement with the insurer. After the Event insurance can feel comparatively more expensive when compared to scheme premiums, the nature of the risk being very different at the point insurance cover is taken out.

Whilst recoverability of ATE premiums has all but disappeared over the years, it still remains the case that premiums can be recovered in publication and privacy disputes and for certain disbursements incurred in clinical negligence cases.

Usually, ATE premiums can be offered on a deferred and contingent basis meaning that the customer is only responsible to pay the premium on conclusion of the case and only in the event that the case is successful. ATE premiums are often staged to ensure that they remain as proportionate as possible with cases settling early attracting a lower premium than those settling at trial.

Whilst recoverability of ATE premiums has all but disappeared over the years, it still remains the case that premiums can be recovered in publication and privacy disputes and for certain disbursements incurred in clinical negligence cases. Standalone BTE policies are also offered, but premiums can be significantly higher than those found on scheme business, and in some respects, simply from a pricing perspective, can be comparable to ATE premiums.

ATE is capable of catering for less run of the mill cases, such as assisting with investment or shareholding disputes, defamation cases, insolvency and large scale commercial disputes.

ATE is capable of catering for less run of the mill cases, such as assisting with investment or shareholding disputes, defamation cases, insolvency and large scale commercial disputes.

Indemnity under an ATE policy is tailored to the specific needs of the case as the lawyer will have an informed view on the potential liability to the customer in the event that the case is unsuccessful. Working with the lawyer (who has conduct of the case) to place the insurance at the earliest stage possible and with a realistic view as to potential adverse costs and disbursements, will ultimately help keep the ATE premium to a reasonable and proportionate level to the value of the claim.

Customer choice in terms of which lawyer handles their claim can be of great importance to commercial customers. Working with someone who has either worked with the business before or who has come recommended can alleviate some of the anxiety that comes with litigation. ATE policies place no restriction on a customer’s choice of lawyer.

Customer choice in terms of which lawyer handles their claim can be of great importance to commercial customers. ATE policies place no restriction on a customer’s choice of lawyer.

In ATE, a flexible approach is taken where the lawyer is left to take steps in the proceedings that they consider are reasonable and necessary, enabling litigation to flow unimpeded by the requirements of the insurer. As the lawyers own costs are only paid on a successful conclusion, the interests of the ATE insurer are very firmly aligned with that of the lawyer facilitating this, but with a more ‘hands-off’ approach.

As access to justice becomes more expensive, advising your customers on the availability of legal expenses insurance could mean the difference between the success or failure of that business in the event that they become involved in a legal dispute.

Carol Parsons is Head of ATE at DAS.

MIB v Lewis: A Legal Landmark

Rebecca Squires, ATE Technical Supervisor, DAS UK Group looks at the landmark MIB v Lewis case. DAS UK provided Thompsons Solicitors, which acted for the claimant, with its ATE Personal Injury product to help fund the case…

August 2020 Learn more
We can all do more to help clients and customers

Alison Whitcombe, Propositions Manager at DAS, looks at how the ATE industry can do more to help clients and customers.

August 2020 Learn more
LEI: the UK’s most important insurance cover?

Legal expenses insurance has a major part to play in giving people and SMEs everyday peace of mind, now more than ever before.

June 2020 Learn more

Read more from DAS

ATE The evolution of ATE

Nathan Holt, Head of ATE & BTE Underwriting at DAS, provides his unique view on an everchanging legal landscape and ATE’s role in providing access to justice.

December 2023
ATE 1,100 and counting – the rise of dispute resolution

Mediation and dispute resolution are on the rise, and are increasingly being preferred over court. Paul Balen, Director at Trust Mediation and Trust Arbitration, tells us more.

December 2023
ATE Fixed Recoverable Costs: is Jackson “finished”?

Nick McDonnell, Director at Kain Knight, looks at the Jackson reforms and what work remains to be done.

December 2023
ATE Looking back on 2023 & looking ahead to 2024 in ATE

Henrietta Hughes, Barrister at 3PB, looks back at developments in the road traffic and personal injury arena.

December 2023
ATE Empowering smaller legal practices: The success of the Optimise scheme

The Optimise scheme, launched by DAS and Maxima, has supported over 100 clients over the past two years, transforming the landscape for clinical negligence and personal injury cases.

October 2023
ATE The pros and cons of a Low Damages FRC (LD FRC) process in clinical negligence

Lisa O’Dwyer from Action against Medical Accidents looks at how the LDFRC process will affect Clinical Negligence claims.

September 2023
ATE Fixed Recoverable Costs is upon us

William Ellerton, Partner at DAS Law, gives his predictions for how the new FRC could play out.

September 2023
ATE How QOCS changes have affected a law firm

Matthew Olner, solicitor at Nelsons, talks about how the QOCS changes have affected his law firm.

June 2023
ATE QOCS changes: The ATE Provider’s Perspective

In this article, Rebecca Squires and Jane Marigold from DAS give their perspective on the QOCS changes.

June 2023
ATE QOCS – Two months on: A Barrister’s View

The full impact of the QOCS changes will be played out in years rather than months. Here, Henry King from 12 King’s Bench addresses what might be done about it from a claimant perspective.

June 2023
ATE The impact of QOCS on costs lawyers

Change has long been brewing in relation to the Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) regime.

June 2023
Events , ATE Rising to the Challenge: How ATE can benefit you and your customers

Carol Parsons, Head of ATE at DAS, talks about ATE and its numerous strengths ahead of BIBA 2023.

May 2023
LEI news insights , Events DAS Powering Partnerships: How understanding legal risks can help you connect with customers

Ahead of BIBA 2023, here's a look at what we have to offer to customers, particularly in uncertain times.

April 2023