Fixed Recoverable Costs is upon us

29th September 2023
William EllertonWilliam Ellerton



So, it is almost upon us – or possibly, depending on when you read this article, it is already upon us.  1 October 2023 is the magic date – the introduction of Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC) for legal cases within the Fast and new Intermediate track. 

Many commentators hail this as the biggest change for a decade. That might be an understatement – for those litigators old enough to remember, the date of 1 October 2023 may well become emblazoned on our minds in the same way the 26 April 1999 did.

Don’t recall that date? It was the introduction of the new Civil Procedure Rules which hailed “all change” in the litigation world.

What’s the story?

So, what is in store at the start of October? What will change?

The short answer is “a lot”, but this has been brewing for a while. After 1 October the recoverable costs in most Fast Track and Intermediate Track cases will be fixed. This is an idea that has its genesis in the Britpop era of the 1990’s. Finally, some 25 years later – when coincidentally most Britpop bands (apart from Oasis) are making their comebacks – it is finally upon us. 

The thinking behind FRC is truly revolutionary for those cases to which it applies.  Prior to FRC, a profitable case was a difficult case that required a substantial time input from a senior lawyer.  Now the opposite is true.  The most profitable case will be one that can be resolved with the minimum time input and at the most junior level. The costs recovery is the same regardless of time spent and lawyer seniority.

What are the implications?

First and foremost, the new regime rewards efficiency and lower cost. If a firm can use a paralegal where it previously used a solicitor, it will do so. Firms will invest in more sophisticated case management and possibly, as it evolves, AI (though that is a topic for another day).  

Settlement of litigation will become more tactical. The amount of costs that can be recovered will be governed by the stage at which the case settles and the complexity band that the case sits in (1-4).

A claimant lawyer may look to settle at the point a case tips into the next stage, where more costs are available – the defendant lawyer will look to do the opposite. The claimant lawyer will argue for a high level of complexity – the defendant lawyer will argue for the opposite. Not all of this will be capable of agreement, and we should expect a truck load of satellite litigation in the coming years to establish the parameters.  What exactly is a Band 4 complexity case? The short answer is we don’t really know.

How are clients affected?

What about the impact on clients? Will FRC help them? Here too, there is some doubt. The underlying idea is to make litigation costs predictable and cheaper. Certainly for some cases, that will happen. However, there is nothing to stop lawyers looking to their clients to “top up” the costs they will no longer recover from their opponent. Will that increase access to justice? It could easily do the opposite. 

And what about the future?

The arrival of FRC has been met with some trepidation. Legal challenges are afoot around some parts of the new rules. However, the prevailing message is that these changes are here to stay and will be extended over time. It is not unrealistic to think that in some five years’ time the FRC regime will cover cases up to £250k.

Time will tell whether FRC was a good idea. In all likelihood, it will be a mixed bag – some good, some bad. Some marginal cases that would have been pursued under the old rules will not be pursued. Some clients will pay less. Some clients however will pay more when they are asked to pick up the tab for the FRC shortfall. Efficiency will increase. Lawyers will rightly look to get the job done at the most junior level appropriate.

When all is said and done, the balance that needs to be drawn is the one that Dominic Regan drew attention to, quoting Sir Rupert Jackson – “If the costs are too high, people cannot afford lawyers.  If the costs are too low, there will not be any lawyers doing the work”.  FRC is touted as the solution to this.  The coming years will tell us whether that will be the case.

Will the extension of Fixed Recoverable Costs have any real impact on the CN sector?

Ian Cohen, from the Cohen Consultancy looks at how the extension of Fixed Recoverable Costs will affect the Clinical Negligence sector.

October 2023 Learn more
Fixed Recoverable Costs – a Costs Lawyer’s view

Adam Grant, Costs Lawyer at KE Costs, weighs in on the biggest shake-up of civil litigation costs since 2013.

October 2023 Learn more
The pros and cons of a Low Damages FRC (LD FRC) process in clinical negligence

Lisa O’Dwyer from Action against Medical Accidents looks at how the LDFRC process will affect Clinical Negligence claims.

September 2023 Learn more

Read more from DAS

ATE Dispute resolution through the eyes of an ATE provider

Dispute Resolution (DR) has been a factor throughout our 22 years of providing ATE insurance.

April 2024
ATE Resolving healthcare disputes with sensitivity and efficiency

Ian Long from Browne Jacobson talks about the importance of approaching clinical negligence disputes with sensitivity and empathy.

April 2024
ATE Using mediation in clinical negligence cases

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in clinical negligence claims can take many forms, including mediation. Anna Sari from Morrish Solicitors explains.

April 2024
ATE What we have learned from 7 years of mediation

Paul Balen from Trust Mediation reflects on what he has found from his time working under the NHS Resolution Mediation Scheme.

April 2024
ATE The evolution of ATE

Nathan Holt, Head of ATE & BTE Underwriting at DAS, provides his unique view on an everchanging legal landscape and ATE’s role in providing access to justice.

December 2023
ATE 1,100 and counting – the rise of dispute resolution

Mediation and dispute resolution are on the rise, and are increasingly being preferred over court. Paul Balen, Director at Trust Mediation and Trust Arbitration, tells us more.

December 2023
ATE Fixed Recoverable Costs: is Jackson “finished”?

Nick McDonnell, Director at Kain Knight, looks at the Jackson reforms and what work remains to be done.

December 2023
ATE Looking back on 2023 & looking ahead to 2024 in ATE

Henrietta Hughes, Barrister at 3PB, looks back at developments in the road traffic and personal injury arena.

December 2023
ATE Empowering smaller legal practices: The success of the Optimise scheme

The Optimise scheme, launched by DAS and Maxima, has supported over 100 clients over the past two years, transforming the landscape for clinical negligence and personal injury cases.

October 2023
ATE The pros and cons of a Low Damages FRC (LD FRC) process in clinical negligence

Lisa O’Dwyer from Action against Medical Accidents looks at how the LDFRC process will affect Clinical Negligence claims.

September 2023
ATE Fixed Recoverable Costs is upon us

William Ellerton, Partner at DAS Law, gives his predictions for how the new FRC could play out.

September 2023
ATE How QOCS changes have affected a law firm

Matthew Olner, solicitor at Nelsons, talks about how the QOCS changes have affected his law firm.

June 2023
ATE QOCS changes: The ATE Provider’s Perspective

In this article, Rebecca Squires and Jane Marigold from DAS give their perspective on the QOCS changes.

June 2023