Personal legal expenses insurance could help you and your family with a number of legal issues, depending on what cover you have.
This site can help you learn about legal expenses insurance, how to get it, and how to use it if you have it.
See what we offer to our people
Legal expenses insurance can help you with a number of legal issues affecting your business.
News and analysis from our experts
Many brokers and law firms have chosen to partner with DAS.
Here you can find out why our partners choose us, and how you can join them.
We've now made it even easier for customers to make a claim. Here you can find out how.
As consultations go, it was always going to be ambitious, sprawling and dividing of opinions. When, in 2017, we submitted our considered thoughts as an industry towards the government’s consultation on Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC), we did so in the full knowledge that there would be no quick and easy solution.
Such a complex multi-industry issue – weighing up the high costs of litigation against the NHS, versus vital access to justice – wouldn’t be an easy one to move forward; but that’s the task in hand. Following the recent SCIL conference I thought it might be useful to reiterate our thoughts on the matter.
As an active player in the ATE insurance market since 2002, DAS UK has gained considerable experience in insuring clinical negligence (CN) claims, having written over 20,000 policies to date, and we continue to work closely with many leading CN practitioners.
We fully agree with the need to streamline processes, improving and reducing the cost of clinical negligence litigation, and ultimately resolving more litigation cases more quickly. In our view, this should be achieved without reducing access justice for patients, irrespective of whether their claims are large or small.
In general terms, we will always welcome the introduction of new measures that can ultimately improve patient care and enhance the experience that patients receive when dealing with the NHS. And in our view, that experience is not limited to when patients are examined, treated or looked after in hospitals and practices, but also the subsequent contact where that is necessary – including where litigation is required.
However, the introduction of fixed recoverable costs is a source of concern to DAS UK for various reasons.
Essentially there are already a number of measures in place to limit costs recovery to cases that are deemed reasonable both at an early stage of a claim, and also on conclusion. But we believe the impact these measures have had on cost proportionality has not been fully realised since a considerable quantity of claims written post-LASPO have yet to reach conclusion.
The introduction of FRC in low value claims will inevitably make it harder, if not impossible, for people with low value claims to find law firms to run their cases.
Firstly, a revised overriding objective was introduced into the Civil Procedure Rules in April 2013. This enables the court “to deal with cases justly and at proportionate costs”. Costs assessed on the Standard Basis will not be recoverable if they are considered to be disproportionate.
Secondly, the introduction of costs budgeting has provided claimant, defendant and the court with the opportunity to consider both quantum and complexity of a specific claim and agree an appropriate budget in order to bring the claim to conclusion.
Thirdly, legislative changes introduced under LASPO resulted in the abolition of recoverable success fees and limited recovery of ATE premiums. These changes were introduced to address what were perceived as the disproportionate costs in pursuing claims involving personal injury and CN.
The proposed changes seek to make the current CN process less lengthy and adversarial by abolishing or significantly reducing the existence of claims under £25,000. This ‘solution’ is likely to achieve this objective, but it will be at the cost of the right to a fair outcome for claimants in low value cases. At a time when routes to access to justice are under threat more than even before, it’s this that we find problematic.
Conversations with our specialist partner firms in recent months have suggested that, already, the thorny issue of proportionality has meant that cases valued under £100,000 are less viable to run, due to damages being unconnected to complexity in CN litigation. It seems to me that it is extremely likely that if FRC is implemented, most firms will have no choice but to exit the lower value market.
The Society of Clinical Injury Lawyers (SCIL), supported by Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA), continue to lobby against the plans, and has submitted its own proposals, which would reduce costs – but crucially not at the expense of claimants. With the weight of these experienced and respected bodies lobbying hard in support of both access to justice and patient safety, we are sure that this debate is far from over.
We’ll be fascinated to see where this goes next. Something pragmatic, possibly even an innovative solution, would be really welcome, but as long as the way forward services the interests of justice, we’ll be happy.
As for prog rock – I’ve always been more of a neo-progressive man.
David Brown is ATE Underwriting Manager at DAS UK Group.
Fran Clothier, DAS UK Group’s ATE Business Partnership Manager, shares her thoughts on the thought provoking annual SCIL (Society of Clinical Injury Lawyers) conference which took place in Birmingham recently.
Nathan Holt, Head of Trading Underwriting at DAS, looks at how things could end up for landlords in the unknown post-Brexit landscape.
DAS UK Group – Connect with us at BIBA 2019
SCIL 2019: A meeting of minds
Alison Whitcombe, Propositions Manager at DAS, looks at how the ATE industry can do more to help clients and customers.
Jane Harper, ATE Technician, DAS UK Group looks at the ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust case which will have huge repercussions for clinical negligence.
Legal expenses insurance has a major part to play in giving people and SMEs everyday peace of mind, now more than ever before.
2019 was another interesting year across the clinical negligence, civil litigation and personal injury sectors. We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners what their predictions are for 2020…
We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners what their achievements were, what their fears are, and what they thought of the latest technological developments.
It’s been another interesting year across the clinical negligence, civil litigation and personal injury sectors. We asked some of our ATE team and solicitor partners for their thoughts on 2019.
DAS has partnered with property technology company Goodlord to launch a new Rent and Legal Protection policy for Goodlord customers.
The recent court decision of West & Demouilpied was a potentially huge moment for the ATE market. David Brown breaks down the potential impact on ATE premiums and more.
To mark the centenary of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919, we got some female perspectives on ATE insurance and the role it plays in supporting access to justice.
With the AvMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference (ACNC) taking place in Leeds this week, Robyn Lampon from DAS UK Group looks at how ATE insurance has evolved over the last 20 years.
Now that the BIBA bubble has burst for another year, Social Media Executive Steph Davies takes a look back at BIBA 2019 and asks: Was it a success on social?
In response to some general criticism of Legal Expenses Insurance (LEI) in the press recently, Nathan Holt, Head of Trading Underwriting at DAS UK, sets the record straight.
Ahead of BIBA 2019, Stephanie Davies – Social Media Executive at DAS UK – takes a look at how social media can be used to make an impression and maximise value from the biggest insurance broker event of the year.