ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust: The Repercussions for Clinical Negligence

10th July 2020

Jane Harper, ATE Technician at DAS UK Group looks at the ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust case which will have huge repercussions for clinical negligence. DAS UK provided Fieldfisher, the claimant’s solicitors, with its ATE Clinical Negligence product to help fund the case.

Earlier this year we saw the judgment of ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and others, a high profile and widely debated clinical negligence case concerning whether there was a duty to disclose a patient’s hereditary disease to his child.

The factual background was one of great family tragedy. The claimant was ABC and the claimant’s father had shot and killed her mother. The father was convicted of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility and made subject to a hospital order under the Mental Health Act. The father received care from a multidisciplinary team. Despite the impact of her father’s offence, the claimant continued to be involved in his care and attended family therapy sessions.

In 2009, ABC informed her father that she was pregnant. During the father’s detention he was diagnosed with Huntington’s disease, meaning his daughters each had a 50% chance of having inherited the disease.Huntington’s Disease is a condition that progressively stops part of the brain working properly. The brain gradually deteriorates over time and is generally fatal after a period of up to 20 years.

ABC brought a claim against three NHS Trusts. She argued that they had breached a duty of care owed to her and / or acted contrary to her rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The allegation being that they failed to alert her to the risk she had inherited the gene for Huntington disease in time for her to terminate her pregnancy.

Within the High Court Judgment Mrs Justice Yip, considered four questions:

  1. Did any or all of the defendants owe ABC a duty of care?
  2. If so, was there a duty to disclose to ABC the Huntington’s diagnosis?
  3. Did the defendants breach this duty in not disclosing the diagnosis to her?
  4. If there was a breach, did she suffer loss and damages by not having the opportunity to obtain genetic testing and terminate her pregnancy?

The case is an important one as, for the first time, the court has recognised that clinicians can owe legal duties of care to people other than their patients.

If a doctor is under a duty to perform tests, there is no point in those tests being completed but no action being taken in response.

Mrs Justice Yip

Unfortunately, the claim failed on the particular facts but Mrs Justice Yip’s decision means that clinicians now have a legal duty to consider whether to disclose confidential information about their patient to certain third parties, where that information reveals a serious risk to the third party. She described this as a duty to perform a detailed balancing exercise between the interests of the third party with whom the medical professional has a sufficiently close relationship and the original patient’s interest in confidentiality.

Mrs Justice Yip concluded at paragraphs 188 and 189 that: “…it is fair, just and reasonable to impose on the second defendant a legal duty to the claimant to balance her interest in being informed of her genetic risk against her father’s interest in preserving confidentiality in relation to his diagnosis and the public interest in maintaining medical confidentiality generally…the scope of the duty extends not only to conducting the necessary balancing exercise but also to acting in accordance with its outcome. It would be irrational to hold otherwise. If a doctor is under a duty to perform tests, there is no point in those tests being completed but no action being taken in response. The same is true of the balancing exercise.”

Furthermore, Mrs Justice Yip did not limit this duty to just cases involving genetic information, but rather to any kind of health confidentiality. This case therefore, has significant implications on UK clinicians in a range of areas. It has opened the door for other cases to succeed based on their particular facts where the balancing exercise would fall in favour of disclosure and a failure to do so might give rise to an action.

Importantly for practitioners though, in recognising a legal duty in these terms, the law is not imposing a new obligation on doctors or hospital trusts. Rather, the legal duty recognises and runs parallel to the professional duty to undertake a proper balancing exercise which all the experts in this case agreed already exists.

Although ABC lost her claim, it should in many respects be considered a victory as the judge found the new duty that we sought from the beginning. Without DAS UK’s willingness to support difficult cases, we could not have proceeded.

Jonathan Zimmern, Fieldfisher

Jonathan Zimmern from Fieldfisher told us: “We are very disappointed that ABC did not succeed in her claim. However, this was a very important decision which has created a new legal duty of care. Whilst ABC is clearly very upset by the decision, the new duty of care should help to ensure that the interests of other people in similar situations will automatically be considered by doctors.

“Both ABC and Fieldfisher are very grateful for DAS’s support in this groundbreaking case. Although ABC lost her claim, it should in many respects be considered a victory as the judge found the new duty that we sought from the beginning. Without DAS UK’s willingness to support difficult cases, we could not have proceeded. I do not think every ATE insurer would have agreed to work with us to take the case forward.”

DAS UK strives to do the right thing for its solicitor business partners and their clients. Although we share the disappointment of the outcome with our business partner, we are happy to have supported a claim that has resulted in a change of law that will potentially assist others in the future.

For further information on our clinical negligence products and services contact

DAS UK Group wins Simply Business partnership

DAS UK Group, the UK’s leading specialist legal expenses insurer, has announced a partnership with Simply Business, one of the UK’s largest small business and landlord insurance providers.

July 2020 Learn more
LEI: the UK’s most important insurance cover?

Legal expenses insurance has a major part to play in giving people and SMEs everyday peace of mind, now more than ever before.

June 2020 Learn more

Legal articles The Return to Work from Covid: How businesses can stay on the right side of the law

Although lockdown restrictions are easing for many businesses across the country, health & safety and social distancing measures still apply.

May 2021
LEI news insights , Events , 2022 BIBA 2022 – Why your client might benefit from ATE insurance

We share two case studies highlighting the benefits of ATE insurance.

May 2022
LEI news insights , Events , 2022 BIBA 2022: DAS to showcase legal services designed to provide immediate value

DAS has announced that it will be showcasing a suite of legal risk-mitigation product extensions at this year’s British Insurance Brokers' Association (BIBA).

April 2022
Legal articles Covid-19: Is your business worried about eviction?

The Covid-19 crisis has seen an unprecedented number of businesses facing collapse. But what happens if your business has an opportunity to get back on its feet only to face eviction from the landlord?

May 2021
LEI news insights , ATE , 2022 The importance of ATE to commercial LEI customers

Carol Parsons, Head of ATE at DAS, explains the difference between After the Event and Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance.

April 2022
Legal articles Airbnb and holiday lettings: What to do with the staycation boom

Thomas Pertaia, a solicitor at DAS Law, answers the most important questions for existing Airbnb hosts and those thinking of renting out their properties.

August 2021
Legal articles The return to work: a guide for employers

Molly-Ellen Turecek looks at what employers need to consider when returning employees to work.

May 2021
2021 DAS appoints new CEO

Subject to Regulatory approval, Chief Customer Officer Tony Coram will be appointed DAS CEO with effect from January 2022.

October 2021
Legal articles Farms and trespassing: know your rights

Mark Woodman, solicitor at DAS Law, looks at what farmers need to know about trespassing.

June 2021
Products , ATE , 2021 DAS UK partners with Maxima to launch new Clinical Negligence & Personal Injury scheme

DAS and Maxima have launched ‘Optimise’, a new clinical negligence/personal injury scheme aimed specifically at smaller legal practices.

June 2021
Products , ATE , 2021 DAS and Pattinson & Brewer announce ATE Clinical Negligence partnership

DAS and Pattinson & Brewer have announced a new partnership to provide a bespoke clinical negligence product for the practice’s clients.

May 2021
Legal articles Farming tenancies: what you need to know

Mark Woodman, Solicitor at DAS Law, looks at what farmers need to know regarding a Farm Business Tenancy.

June 2021
Legal articles How to keep your workers safe during Farm Safety Week

Mark Woodman, Solicitor at DAS Law, looks at what farmers are legally required to do to keep both themselves and their workers safe.

July 2021