Personal legal expenses insurance could help you and your family with a number of legal issues, depending on what cover you have. This site can help you learn about legal expenses insurance, how to get it, and how to use it if you have it.
See what we offer to our people
Legal expenses insurance can help you with a number of legal issues affecting your business.
News and analysis from our experts
Many brokers and law firms have chosen to partner with DAS. Here you can find out why our partners choose us, and how you can join them.
We've now made it even easier for customers to make a claim. Here you can find out how.
With the AvMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference (ACNC) taking place in Leeds this week, Robyn Lampon from DAS looks at how After the Event (ATE) insurance has evolved over the last 20 years.
Operational Support Manager, ATE
ATE insurance was born nearly 20 years ago in the wake of the Access to Justice Act 1999 which revolutionised the legal aid system in England and Wales.
We were one of the first companies to provide the cover and, at first, it was all so straightforward – no initial premium payment required, the premium effectively being ‘self-insured’, and all of it written off if the case didn’t win.
It was, however, a completely new development for solicitors and therefore an extraordinarily clunky process with only single risks being considered and all cases assessed individually.
The transformation of ATE has been little short of remarkable, and it is a perfect example of changes in market circumstances creating a need for a product.
Robyn Lampon
The ATE market soon evolved rapidly into one of high volume, low value, and primarily personal injury cases (which actually provided DAS with the underwriting capability that ultimately led to us providing delegated authority to solicitor firms).
Then, when LASPO appeared in 2013, it radically changed the sector, moving it away from personal injury (although not completely), to become much more centred on clinical negligence.
A key development in the market has been the move from individual case assessments to solicitors firms making key decisions via delegated authority. This has had a huge impact in making the system far more collaborative and efficient, something that would have been utterly unthinkable back in 2000.
The transformation of ATE has in fact been little short of remarkable, and it is a perfect example of changes in market circumstances creating a need for a product. Scores of injured people who have had their lives turned upside down through no fault of their own, and who lack traditional BTE insurance, now have a way with which to obtain access to justice and, hopefully, redress.
As it has become harder for the average person to afford legal assistance, ATE insurance has been firmly established as an incredibly important funding vehicle and facilitator of access to justice.
ATE has faced repeated existential challenges, weathering a number of market-defining court decisions and changes in the law, many of which had they played out differently would have meant the end for ATE. Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1134, is an obvious example where the issue of proportionality and reasonableness of the pre-LASPO premium model were addressed.
ATE continues to assist customers and law firms in ways that could not have been predicted in 2000.
The story of ATE is about the positive evolution of a ground breaking, sometimes controversial, but consistently socially important, insurance product.
Here’s to another 20 years!
Heading to the ACNC this year? Arrange a meeting with one of our ATE team:
Contact us
To mark the centenary of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919, we got some female perspectives on ATE insurance and the role it plays in supporting access to justice.
Two years on the government’s consultation on fixed recoverable costs, ATE Underwriting Manager David Brown restates the DAS position on this highly complex issue.
Enrique Gomez, Head of ATE at DAS UK Group, looks at how the time is right for innovation in the ATE sector.
AvMA 2019: Women in law talk ATE
BIBA 2019: Did it lead the way on social?
The Optimise scheme, launched by DAS and Maxima, has supported over 100 clients over the past two years, transforming the landscape for clinical negligence and personal injury cases.
Lisa O’Dwyer from Action against Medical Accidents looks at how the LDFRC process will affect Clinical Negligence claims.
William Ellerton, Partner at DAS Law, gives his predictions for how the new FRC could play out.
Matthew Olner, solicitor at Nelsons, talks about how the QOCS changes have affected his law firm.
In this article, Rebecca Squires and Jane Marigold from DAS give their perspective on the QOCS changes.
The full impact of the QOCS changes will be played out in years rather than months. Here, Henry King from 12 King’s Bench addresses what might be done about it from a claimant perspective.
Change has long been brewing in relation to the Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) regime.
Carol Parsons, Head of ATE at DAS, talks about ATE and its numerous strengths ahead of BIBA 2023.
Since the introduction of QOCS and the subsequent change to ATE premiums being payable by the client, solicitors have faced some challenges when the client is a minor.
Carol Parsons, Head of ATE at DAS, explains the difference between After the Event and Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance.
DAS and Maxima have launched ‘Optimise’, a new clinical negligence/personal injury scheme aimed specifically at smaller legal practices.
DAS and Pattinson & Brewer have announced a new partnership to provide a bespoke clinical negligence product for the practice’s clients.
DAS has been chosen by Smith Partnership to provide a bespoke clinical negligence product for the practice’s clients.