Personal legal expenses insurance could help you and your family with a number of legal issues, depending on what cover you have. This site can help you learn about legal expenses insurance, how to get it, and how to use it if you have it.
See what we offer to our people
Legal expenses insurance can help you with a number of legal issues affecting your business.
News and analysis from our experts
Many brokers and law firms have chosen to partner with DAS. Here you can find out why our partners choose us, and how you can join them.
We've now made it even easier for customers to make a claim. Here you can find out how.
With the AvMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference (ACNC) taking place in Leeds this week, Robyn Lampon from DAS looks at how After the Event (ATE) insurance has evolved over the last 20 years.
Operational Support Manager, ATE
ATE insurance was born nearly 20 years ago in the wake of the Access to Justice Act 1999 which revolutionised the legal aid system in England and Wales.
We were one of the first companies to provide the cover and, at first, it was all so straightforward – no initial premium payment required, the premium effectively being ‘self-insured’, and all of it written off if the case didn’t win.
It was, however, a completely new development for solicitors and therefore an extraordinarily clunky process with only single risks being considered and all cases assessed individually.
The transformation of ATE has been little short of remarkable, and it is a perfect example of changes in market circumstances creating a need for a product.
Robyn Lampon
The ATE market soon evolved rapidly into one of high volume, low value, and primarily personal injury cases (which actually provided DAS with the underwriting capability that ultimately led to us providing delegated authority to solicitor firms).
Then, when LASPO appeared in 2013, it radically changed the sector, moving it away from personal injury (although not completely), to become much more centred on clinical negligence.
A key development in the market has been the move from individual case assessments to solicitors firms making key decisions via delegated authority. This has had a huge impact in making the system far more collaborative and efficient, something that would have been utterly unthinkable back in 2000.
The transformation of ATE has in fact been little short of remarkable, and it is a perfect example of changes in market circumstances creating a need for a product. Scores of injured people who have had their lives turned upside down through no fault of their own, and who lack traditional BTE insurance, now have a way with which to obtain access to justice and, hopefully, redress.
As it has become harder for the average person to afford legal assistance, ATE insurance has been firmly established as an incredibly important funding vehicle and facilitator of access to justice.
ATE has faced repeated existential challenges, weathering a number of market-defining court decisions and changes in the law, many of which had they played out differently would have meant the end for ATE. Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1134, is an obvious example where the issue of proportionality and reasonableness of the pre-LASPO premium model were addressed.
ATE continues to assist customers and law firms in ways that could not have been predicted in 2000.
The story of ATE is about the positive evolution of a ground breaking, sometimes controversial, but consistently socially important, insurance product.
Here’s to another 20 years!
Heading to the ACNC this year? Arrange a meeting with one of our ATE team:
Contact us
To mark the centenary of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919, we got some female perspectives on ATE insurance and the role it plays in supporting access to justice.
Two years on the government’s consultation on fixed recoverable costs, ATE Underwriting Manager David Brown restates the DAS position on this highly complex issue.
Enrique Gomez, Head of ATE at DAS UK Group, looks at how the time is right for innovation in the ATE sector.
AvMA 2019: Women in law talk ATE
BIBA 2019: Did it lead the way on social?
Dispute Resolution (DR) has been a factor throughout our 22 years of providing ATE insurance.
Ian Long from Browne Jacobson talks about the importance of approaching clinical negligence disputes with sensitivity and empathy.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in clinical negligence claims can take many forms, including mediation. Anna Sari from Morrish Solicitors explains.
Paul Balen from Trust Mediation reflects on what he has found from his time working under the NHS Resolution Mediation Scheme.
Nathan Holt, Head of ATE & BTE Underwriting at DAS, provides his unique view on an everchanging legal landscape and ATE’s role in providing access to justice.
Mediation and dispute resolution are on the rise, and are increasingly being preferred over court. Paul Balen, Director at Trust Mediation and Trust Arbitration, tells us more.
Nick McDonnell, Director at Kain Knight, looks at the Jackson reforms and what work remains to be done.
Henrietta Hughes, Barrister at 3PB, looks back at developments in the road traffic and personal injury arena.
The Optimise scheme, launched by DAS and Maxima, has supported over 100 clients over the past two years, transforming the landscape for clinical negligence and personal injury cases.
Lisa O’Dwyer from Action against Medical Accidents looks at how the LDFRC process will affect Clinical Negligence claims.
William Ellerton, Partner at DAS Law, gives his predictions for how the new FRC could play out.
Matthew Olner, solicitor at Nelsons, talks about how the QOCS changes have affected his law firm.
In this article, Rebecca Squires and Jane Marigold from DAS give their perspective on the QOCS changes.